Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The UK Finds Killdeer

And they give us an article and a video.

Telegraph.co.uk

And for anyone who may still be unaware, there is a documentary currently in the editing stage pertaining to the Parshall/Stanley area by Couple 3 Films.

Couple3.com Trailer

12 comments:

david said...

Here is a link for the blog on the documentary. You have to read the blog backwards for it to make sense and there is a second page with earlier posts you should start on
Johnny Warberg has made the movies!

.
http://couple3.com/blog/

Anonymous said...

http://finance.alphatrade.com/story/2008-08-29/CCN/200808291431CCNMATHWCANADAPR_0482884001.html

Anonymous said...

http://finance.alphatrade.com/story/2008-08-29/CNW/200808290730CANADANWCANADAPR_C7987.html

Anonymous said...

http://www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.t4RRr.d.htm

Anonymous said...

UPDATED...

http://www.whiting.com/download/GENERAL_CORPORATE_INFORMATION.pdf

Anonymous said...

NDIC Docket for Thursday, September 25, 2008
Case No. 10525: Application of Brigham Oil & Gas, L.P. for an order extending the field
boundaries and amending the field rules for the Alger-Bakken Pool to create
and establish three 1280-acre spacing units comprised of Sections 27 and 34,
T.155N., R.92W., Sections 21 and 28, T.155N., R.93W., and, Section 4,
T.155N., R.93W and Section 33, T.156N., R.93W., Mountrail County, ND,
authorizing the drilling of one horizontal well on each spacing unit and such
other relief as is appropriate.

Anonymous said...

http://markets.chron.com/chron?GUID=6457039&Page=MediaViewer&Ticker=%24CHRON

Anonymous said...

???

http://www.brighamexplorationco.com/

Anonymous said...

NDIC Docket. Case #10525. Why would Brigham want to go to 1280 acre spacings. Could they do this to claim an unleased neighboring section and then only pay 1/8th to the mineral owner?

Anonymous said...

Brigham presentation up today with tomorrows date.

Anonymous said...

Question above about NDIC Docket. Case #10525.
I think its because thats the spacing in that area.

Anonymous said...

Correction to above. I was viewing the BEXP presentation and had saw what appear to be two long laterals planned west of the Nesson and confused them with the NDIC docket.
As to the reason why, I guess they have there reasons.